linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: gadget: Replace list_for_each_entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87pmv3t24y.fsf@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jul 2021 08:53:49 +0300
From:   Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
To:     Wesley Cheng <wcheng@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, peter.chen@...nel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jackp@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: gadget: Replace
 list_for_each_entry_safe() if using giveback


Hi Wesley,

Wesley Cheng <wcheng@...eaurora.org> writes:
>>>>> Sorry for the late response.  So I tried with a list_replace_init() to
>>>>> within the list_for_each_entry_safe() loop to update tmp w/ the
>>>>> cancelled_list list head, but the issue was still observed.  This is
>>>>> because we can't replace the reference the loop already has stored in
>>>>> tmp, which is simply updated as the current item on the next iteration.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe this is what you were trying to achieve?
>>>>>
>>>> Was wondering if you had any further inputs on this change?  As
>>>> mentioned, I tried a few things with list_replace_init(), which did not
>>>> work.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry for the ping.  Is this change OK to add as is?  We've been running
>>> into this instance pretty frequently during our testing, so just wanted
>>> to close on the proper changes being merged upstream.
>> 
>> The idea is this:
>> 
>> 	struct list_head	local;
>> 
>>         spin_lock_irq(&lock);
>>         list_replace_init(&dwc->cancelled_list, &local);
>>         spin_unlock_irq(&lock);
>> 
>> 	list_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &local, list) {
>>         	/* ... */
>> 	}
>> 
>> It looks to me this should work fine, no? You can also follow what
>> drivers/usb/core/hcd.c is doing in usb_giveback_urb_bh() and restarting
>> if dwc->cancelled_list is not empty after list_for_each_entry_safe().
>> 
>> Can you give that one a shot?
>> 
>
> Great, thanks for this suggestion!  Now I understand what you were
> referring to.  I gave this a try and it works well.  Will prepare a
> change to replace both places with list_replace_init()

this is great news :-) Thanks for trying it out

-- 
balbi