[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210728103732.3befa390@fixe.home>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:37:32 +0200
From: Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: at_xdmac: use module_platform_driver
Le Wed, 28 Jul 2021 13:53:48 +0530,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> a écrit :
> On 28-07-21, 09:38, Clément Léger wrote:
> > Le Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:26:50 +0530,
> > Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> a écrit :
> >
> > > On 25-06-21, 11:00, Clément Léger wrote:
> > > > The driver was previously probed with platform_driver_probe.
> > > > This does not allow the driver to be probed again later if
> > > > probe function returns -EPROBE_DEFER. This patch replace the
> > > > use of platform_driver_probe with module_platform_driver which
> > > > allows that.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c | 6 +-----
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> > > > index 64a52bf4d737..109a4c0895f4 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> > > > @@ -2238,11 +2238,7 @@ static struct platform_driver
> > > > at_xdmac_driver = { }
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > -static int __init at_xdmac_init(void)
> > > > -{
> > > > - return platform_driver_probe(&at_xdmac_driver,
> > > > at_xdmac_probe); -}
> > > > -subsys_initcall(at_xdmac_init);
> > > > +module_platform_driver(at_xdmac_driver);
> > >
> > > You are also changing the init call here, there is a reason why
> > > dmaengine drivers are subsys_initcall.. have you tested this?
> > >
> >
> > I understood that the subsys initcall was there to probe the DMA
> > driver earlier than other drivers (at least I guess this was the
> > reason). I
>
> That is correct
>
> > also tested it and can confirm you this works as expected on my
> > platform (sama5d2_xplained and sama5d27_som1).
> >
> > In my configuration, the clocks are provided using SCMI and the SCMI
> > driver probes them later than other drivers.
>
> Heh, clocks should get probed even earlier
Yes, even clocksources might need them... But that's another story.
>
> > With the current subsys_initcall, platform_driver_probe calls
> > __platform_driver_probe which will eventually calls platform_probe.
> > This one will fails because SCMI clocks are not available at this
> > time. And as said in the kernel doc, __platform_driver_probe is
> > incompatible with deferred probing. This leads to failure of all
> > drivers that needs DMA channels provbided by at_xdmac.
> >
> > With module_platform_driver, the at_xdmac driver is correctly probed
> > again later and all drivers that depends on DMA channels provided by
> > this one are also correctly probed. The deferred probing mechanism
> > seems to do its job correctly (at least in my case).
>
> OK would then recommend making it like module_platform_driver ie
> remove platform_driver_probe, so the defer probe would work, but keep
> the init at subsys level. That should work for you while keeping this
> sane for folks that dont need this
>
Ok, I'll modify it this way, thanks.
--
Clément Léger,
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineer at Bootlin
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists