[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQEfY730Sjkr3w+Y@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 11:12:03 +0200
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Don't report SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV in
sched_getattr()
Hi Quentin,
On 27/07/21 11:11, Quentin Perret wrote:
> SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV is supposed to be a kernel-only flag that userspace
> cannot interact with. However, sched_getattr() currently reports it
> in sched_flags if called on a sugov worker even though it is not
> actually defined in a UAPI header. To avoid this, make sure to
> clean-up the sched_flags field in sched_getattr() before returning to
> userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 2d9ff40f4661..d8f489dcc383 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -7535,6 +7535,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(sched_getattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr,
> kattr.sched_priority = p->rt_priority;
> else
> kattr.sched_nice = task_nice(p);
> + kattr.sched_flags &= SCHED_FLAG_ALL;
Maybe we can do this in the previous patch so that it's kept confined to
deadline bits?
Thanks,
Juri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists