lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2080eb9-bbe2-5077-761d-b5594edb6006@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:24:12 +0800
From:   Li Tuo <islituo@...il.com>
To:     sre@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        baijiaju1990@...il.com
Subject: [BUG] power: supply: 88pm860x_battery: possible
 uninitialized-variable access in measure_vbatt()

Hello,

Our static analysis tool finds a possible uninitialized-variable access 
in the 88pm860x_battery driver in Linux 5.14.0-rc3:

In calc_soc():
369:    int ocv;
376:    switch (state) {
380:    case OCV_MODE_SLEEP:
381:        ret = measure_vbatt(info, OCV_MODE_SLEEP, &ocv);

In measure_vbatt(struct pm860x_battery_info *info, int state, int *data)
176:    switch (state) {
184:    case OCV_MODE_SLEEP:
201:        *data = ((*data & 0xff) * 27 * 25) >> 9;

If the variable state is OCV_MODE_SLEEP, the function measure_vbatt() is 
called with the argument &ocv,
and the corresponding parameter is data. Thus *data is uninitialized but 
it is used at line 201.

I am not quite sure whether this possible uninitialized-variable access 
is real and how to fix it if it is real.
Any feedback would be appreciated, thanks!

Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@...nghua.edu.cn>

Best wishes,
Tuo Li

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ