[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeWKgyz32scczN0c+iJwGZXVP42g0NG0oXrdJ34GyHB8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 13:26:20 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: LED subsystem lagging maintenance
Hi!
I have noticed that in the last couple of cycles the LED subsystem is
a bit laggish in terms of maintenance (*). I think it's time that
someone can help Pavel to sort things out.
In any case, I wonder if we have any kind of procedure for what to do
in such cases. Do we need to assume that the subsystem is in a
(pre-)orphaned state? If so, who is the best to take care of patch
flow?
*) e.g. I have a series against a few drivers in LED with actual fixes
and it is missed v5.13 (okay, that time Pavel had comments which I
have addressed at ~rc7 time frame), missed v5.14 and seems on the
curve to miss v5.15.
P.S. I Cc'ed lately active, AFAICS, in that area people + Greg for his opinion.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists