[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210728153232.1018911-2-dbrazdil@google.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:32:31 +0000
From: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
To: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: Fix off-by-one in range_is_memory
Hyp checks whether an address range only covers RAM by checking the
start/endpoints against a list of memblock_region structs. However,
the endpoint here is exclusive but internally is treated as inclusive.
Fix the off-by-one error that caused valid address ranges to be
rejected.
Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Fixes: 90134ac9cabb6 ("KVM: arm64: Protect the .hyp sections from the host")
Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
index d938ce95d3bd..a6ce991b1467 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static bool range_is_memory(u64 start, u64 end)
{
struct kvm_mem_range r1, r2;
- if (!find_mem_range(start, &r1) || !find_mem_range(end, &r2))
+ if (!find_mem_range(start, &r1) || !find_mem_range(end - 1, &r2))
return false;
if (r1.start != r2.start)
return false;
--
2.32.0.432.gabb21c7263-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists