[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <911b290063ecab50aef8da606ddbc2e27dffa6d7.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:06:18 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Brian Cain <bcain@...eaurora.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>,
Samuel Mendoza-Jonas <sam@...dozajonas.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Alexey Klimov <aklimov@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] all: use find_next_*_bit() instead of
find_first_*_bit() where possible
On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 08:55 -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 08:13:32AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 08:00 -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > Ping again.
> > >
> > > The rebased series together with other bitmap patches can be found
> > > here:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/norov/linux/tree/bitmap-20210716
> > []
> > > > .../bitops => include/linux}/find.h | 149 +++++++++++++++++-
> >
> > A file named find.h in a directory named bitops seems relatively sensible,
> > but a bitops specific file named find.h in include/linux does not.
>
>
> I'm OK with any name, it's not supposed to be included directly. What
> do you think about bitmap_find.h, or can you suggest a better name?
Dunno.
But I'm a bit curious about the duplicate function naming (conflicts?)
with functions in include/linux/bitmap.h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists