linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] cgroup/cpuset: Add a new isolated cpus.partition type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210728160900.GA8905@blackbody.suse.cz>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:09:00 +0200
From:   Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] cgroup/cpuset: Add a new isolated cpus.partition
 type

Hello Waiman.

On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:18:31AM -0400, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
> @@ -2026,6 +2036,22 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
> [...]
> +	} else if (old_prs && new_prs) {

If an isolated root partition becomes invalid (new_prs == PRS_ERROR)...

> +		/*
> +		 * A change in load balance state only, no change in cpumasks.
> +		 */
> +		update_flag(CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE, cs, (new_prs != PRS_ISOLATED));

...this seems to erase information about CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE zeroness.

IOW, if there's an isolated partition that becomes invalid and later
valid again (a cpu is (re)added), it will be a normal root partition
without the requested isolation, which is IMO undesired.

I may have overlooked something in broader context but it seems to me
the invalidity should be saved independently of the root/isolated type.

Regards,
Michal


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)