[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQGCnDZUEhwbinnn@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:15:24 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Widawsky, Ben" <ben.widawsky@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] mm/memplicy: add page allocation function for
MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY policy
On Wed 28-07-21 23:25:07, Feng Tang wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:18:10PM +0800, Tang, Feng wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 02:42:26PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Mon 12-07-21 16:09:30, Feng Tang wrote:
> > > > The semantics of MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY is similar to MPOL_PREFERRED,
> > > > that it will first try to allocate memory from the preferred node(s),
> > > > and fallback to all nodes in system when first try fails.
> > > >
> > > > Add a dedicated function for it just like 'interleave' policy.
> > > >
> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200630212517.308045-9-ben.widawsky@intel.com
> > > > Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> > > > Co-developed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> > >
> > > It would be better to squash this together with the actual user of the
> > > function added by the next patch.
> >
> > Ok, will do
> >
> > > > ---
> > > > mm/mempolicy.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > > > index 17b5800b7dcc..d17bf018efcc 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > > > @@ -2153,6 +2153,25 @@ static struct page *alloc_page_interleave(gfp_t gfp, unsigned order,
> > > > return page;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static struct page *alloc_page_preferred_many(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order,
> > > > + struct mempolicy *pol)
> > >
> > > We likely want a node parameter to know which one we want to start with
> > > for locality. Callers should use policy_node for that.
> >
> > Yes, locality should be considered, something like this?
> >
> > int pnid, lnid = numa_node_id();
> >
> > if (is_nodeset(lnid, &pol->nodes))
> > pnid = local_nid;
> > else
> > pnid = first_node(pol->nodes);
>
> One further thought is, if local node is not in the nodemask,
> should we compare the distance of all the nodes in nodemask
> to the local node and chose the shortest?
Nope, That is zonelist for. Nodemask will do the rest.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists