[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74c71cac-f36a-9c42-2ab1-837c6a068306@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:59:24 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [rfc/patch] mm/slub: restore/expand unfreeze_partials() local
exclusion scope
On 7/27/21 6:09 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-07-26 at 23:26 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 7/26/21 7:00 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>>>
>>> Why not do something like the below?...
>>
>> Yep, sounds like a good approach, thanks. Percpu partial is not *the*
>> SLUB fast path, so it should be sufficient without the lockless cmpxchg
>> tricks. Will incorporate in updated series.
The updated series incorporating hopefully all fixes from Mike and
bigeasy, and rebased to 5.14-rc3 (Thomas told me RT is moving to it), is
here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/linux.git/log/?h=slub-local-lock-v3r0
I'll post it to linux-mm tomorrow.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists