[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210729172748.28841-3-james.morse@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:27:48 +0000
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic-v3: Fix selection of partition domain for EPPIs
commit 5f51f803826e ("irqchip/gic-v3: Add EPPI range support") added
GIC_IRQ_TYPE_PARTITION support for EPPI to gic_irq_domain_translate(),
and commit 52085d3f2028 ("irqchip/gic-v3: Dynamically allocate PPI
partition descriptors") made the gic_data.ppi_descs array big enough for
EPPI, but neither gic_irq_domain_select() nor partition_domain_translate()
were updated.
This means partitions are created by partition_create_desc() for the
EPPI range, but can't be registered as they will always match the root
domain and map to the summary interrupt.
Update gic_irq_domain_select() to match PPI and EPPI. The fwspec for
PPI and EPPI both start from 0. Use gic_irq_domain_translate() to find
the hwirq from the fwspec, then convert this to a ppi index.
Reported-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
---
I'm not aware of a platform affected by this. If wanted as a fix, the
tag would be:
Fixes: 5f51f803826e ("irqchip/gic-v3: Add EPPI range support")
(and merge both patches)
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index b24f0a9d2876..8b6e9b2fc621 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -1472,10 +1472,34 @@ static void gic_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
}
}
+static bool fwspec_is_partitioned_ppi(struct irq_fwspec *fwspec,
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+{
+ enum gic_intid_range range;
+
+ if (!gic_data.ppi_descs)
+ return false;
+
+ if (!is_of_node(fwspec->fwnode))
+ return false;
+
+ if (fwspec->param_count < 4 || !fwspec->param[3])
+ return false;
+
+ range = __get_intid_range(hwirq);
+ if (range != PPI_RANGE && range != EPPI_RANGE)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static int gic_irq_domain_select(struct irq_domain *d,
struct irq_fwspec *fwspec,
enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
{
+ unsigned int type, ret, ppi_idx;
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
+
/* Not for us */
if (fwspec->fwnode != d->fwnode)
return 0;
@@ -1484,16 +1508,19 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_select(struct irq_domain *d,
if (!is_of_node(fwspec->fwnode))
return 1;
+ ret = gic_irq_domain_translate(d, fwspec, &hwirq, &type);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ret))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!fwspec_is_partitioned_ppi(fwspec, hwirq))
+ return d == gic_data.domain;
+
/*
* If this is a PPI and we have a 4th (non-null) parameter,
* then we need to match the partition domain.
*/
- if (fwspec->param_count >= 4 &&
- fwspec->param[0] == 1 && fwspec->param[3] != 0 &&
- gic_data.ppi_descs)
- return d == partition_get_domain(gic_data.ppi_descs[fwspec->param[1]]);
-
- return d == gic_data.domain;
+ ppi_idx = __gic_get_ppi_index(hwirq);
+ return d == partition_get_domain(gic_data.ppi_descs[ppi_idx]);
}
static const struct irq_domain_ops gic_irq_domain_ops = {
@@ -1508,7 +1535,9 @@ static int partition_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
unsigned long *hwirq,
unsigned int *type)
{
+ unsigned long ppi_intid;
struct device_node *np;
+ unsigned int ppi_idx;
int ret;
if (!gic_data.ppi_descs)
@@ -1518,7 +1547,12 @@ static int partition_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
if (WARN_ON(!np))
return -EINVAL;
- ret = partition_translate_id(gic_data.ppi_descs[fwspec->param[1]],
+ ret = gic_irq_domain_translate(d, fwspec, &ppi_intid, type);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ret))
+ return 0;
+
+ ppi_idx = __gic_get_ppi_index(ppi_intid);
+ ret = partition_translate_id(gic_data.ppi_descs[ppi_idx],
of_node_to_fwnode(np));
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists