[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210729114611.13ff7c1c43c883bd039dab40@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:46:11 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
lkp@...el.com
Subject: Re: [mm/page_owner] 866b485262: invoked_oom-killer:gfp_mask=0x
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 09:40:19 +0800 kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com> wrote:
>
>
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9):
>
> commit: 866b485262173a2b873386162b2ddcfbcb542b4a ("mm/page_owner: record the timestamp of all pages during free")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
I don't see how this can happen unless it's a side-effect of making
struct page_owner 8 bytes larger. Does setting
/proc/sys/vm/oom_dump_tasks tell us more?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists