linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: cs42l42: Correct definition of ADC Volume control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <162758812271.3952.13208728919315614383.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:49:21 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: cs42l42: Correct definition of ADC Volume control

On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:09:27 +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> The ADC volume is a signed 8-bit number with range -97 to +12,
> with -97 being mute. Use a SOC_SINGLE_S8_TLV() to define this
> and fix the DECLARE_TLV_DB_SCALE() to have the correct start and
> mute flag.

Applied to

   torvalds/linux.git master

Thanks!

[1/3] ASoC: cs42l42: Correct definition of ADC Volume control
      commit: ee86f680ff4c9b406d49d4e22ddf10805b8a2137
[2/3] ASoC: cs42l42: Don't allow SND_SOC_DAIFMT_LEFT_J
      commit: 64324bac750b84ca54711fb7d332132fcdb87293
[3/3] ASoC: cs42l42: Fix bclk calculation for mono
      commit: 926ef1a4c245c093acc07807e466ad2ef0ff6ccb

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark