[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210729201539.5602-13-logang@deltatee.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:15:30 -0600
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@...eticom.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 12/21] s390/pci: return error code from s390_dma_map_sg()
From: Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@...eticom.com>
The .map_sg() op now expects an error code instead of zero on failure.
So propagate the error from __s390_dma_map_sg() up. __s390_dma_map_sg()
returns either -ENOMEM on allocation failure or -EINVAL which is
the same as what's expected by dma_map_sgtable().
Signed-off-by: Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@...eticom.com>
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Acked-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c
index ebc9a49523aa..c78b02012764 100644
--- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c
+++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static int s390_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
unsigned int max = dma_get_max_seg_size(dev);
unsigned int size = s->offset + s->length;
unsigned int offset = s->offset;
- int count = 0, i;
+ int count = 0, i, ret;
for (i = 1; i < nr_elements; i++) {
s = sg_next(s);
@@ -497,8 +497,9 @@ static int s390_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
if (s->offset || (size & ~PAGE_MASK) ||
size + s->length > max) {
- if (__s390_dma_map_sg(dev, start, size,
- &dma->dma_address, dir))
+ ret = __s390_dma_map_sg(dev, start, size,
+ &dma->dma_address, dir);
+ if (ret)
goto unmap;
dma->dma_address += offset;
@@ -511,7 +512,8 @@ static int s390_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
}
size += s->length;
}
- if (__s390_dma_map_sg(dev, start, size, &dma->dma_address, dir))
+ ret = __s390_dma_map_sg(dev, start, size, &dma->dma_address, dir);
+ if (ret)
goto unmap;
dma->dma_address += offset;
@@ -523,7 +525,7 @@ static int s390_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
s390_dma_unmap_pages(dev, sg_dma_address(s), sg_dma_len(s),
dir, attrs);
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
static void s390_dma_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists