[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQMQJ15KpM0eeLIb@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:31:35 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
"jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
"lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
"pmeerw@...erw.net" <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
"joel@....id.au" <joel@....id.au>,
"andrew@...id.au" <andrew@...id.au>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
BMC-SW <BMC-SW@...eedtech.com>
Subject: Re: [v2 1/8] dt-bindings: iio: adc: rename the aspeed adc yaml
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 06:53:07AM +0000, Billy Tsai wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On 2021/7/23, 10:45 PM, "Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 16:16:14 +0800
> Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com> wrote:
>
> > > The aspeed,ast2400-adc.yaml not only descriptor the bindings of ast2400.
> > > Rename it to aspeed,adc.yaml for all of the aspeed adc bindings.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com>
>
> > We try to avoid 'wild' card type namings most of the time and instead
> > name after a particular part number. I say try because clearly
> > we let a few in over the years :(
>
> > It is very hard to know if this binding will apply to 'all' future
> > aspeed ADCs.
>
> > As such I'm not sure this particular rename makes sense.
>
> If I want to extend the yaml file to compatible more versions of the aspeed adc.
> Would you suggest to add new files call aspeed,ast2600-adc.yaml or just append it
> to the aspeed,ast2400-adc.yaml?
If 2600 is not backwards compatible with 2400, then probably a new
schema file. Given you are adding new properties (which only apply to
2600?), then most likely a new schema file. Depends at which point there
are too many conditional (if/then/else) schemas.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists