[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=U5a=aj5NPOGywVoEGQLuza9T6RhBhw9NT2AT2qxaKzYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:33:22 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] iommu: Refactor DMA domain strictness
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 8:59 AM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Here's v2 where things start to look more realistic, hence the expanded
> CC list. The patches are now based on the current iommu/core branch to
> take John's iommu_set_dma_strict() cleanup into account.
>
> The series remiains in two (or possibly 3) logical parts - for people
> CC'd on cookie cleanup patches, the later parts should not affect you
> since your drivers don't implement non-strict mode anyway; the cleanup
> is all pretty straightforward, but please do yell at me if I've managed
> to let a silly mistake slip through and broken your driver.
>
> This time I have also build-tested x86 as well as arm64 :)
>
> Changes in v2:
>
> - Add iommu_is_dma_domain() helper to abstract flag check (and help
> avoid silly typos like the one in v1).
> - Tweak a few commit messages for spelling and (hopefully) clarity.
> - Move the iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() update to patch #14
> where it should have been.
> - Rewrite patch #20 as a conversion of the now-existing option.
> - Clean up the ops->flush_iotlb_all check which is also made redundant
> by the new domain type
> - Add patch #24, which is arguably tangential, but it was something I
> spotted during the rebase, so...
>
> Once again, the whole lot is available on a branch here:
>
> https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-rm/-/tree/iommu/fq
>
> Thanks,
> Robin.
>
>
> CC: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> CC: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
> CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> CC: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
> CC: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
> CC: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
> CC: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
> CC: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
> CC: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
>
> Robin Murphy (24):
> iommu: Pull IOVA cookie management into the core
> iommu/amd: Drop IOVA cookie management
> iommu/arm-smmu: Drop IOVA cookie management
> iommu/vt-d: Drop IOVA cookie management
> iommu/exynos: Drop IOVA cookie management
> iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Drop IOVA cookie management
> iommu/mtk: Drop IOVA cookie management
> iommu/rockchip: Drop IOVA cookie management
> iommu/sprd: Drop IOVA cookie management
> iommu/sun50i: Drop IOVA cookie management
> iommu/virtio: Drop IOVA cookie management
> iommu/dma: Unexport IOVA cookie management
> iommu/dma: Remove redundant "!dev" checks
> iommu: Introduce explicit type for non-strict DMA domains
> iommu/amd: Prepare for multiple DMA domain types
> iommu/arm-smmu: Prepare for multiple DMA domain types
> iommu/vt-d: Prepare for multiple DMA domain types
> iommu: Express DMA strictness via the domain type
> iommu: Expose DMA domain strictness via sysfs
> iommu: Merge strictness and domain type configs
> iommu/dma: Factor out flush queue init
> iommu: Allow enabling non-strict mode dynamically
> iommu/arm-smmu: Allow non-strict in pgtable_quirks interface
> iommu: Only log strictness for DMA domains
>
> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-iommu_groups | 2 +
> drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 80 +++++++++----------
> drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 21 +----
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 25 ++++--
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 29 ++++---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/qcom_iommu.c | 8 --
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 44 +++++-----
> drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c | 18 +----
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 23 ++----
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 53 +++++++-----
> drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 27 +------
> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 6 --
> drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 11 +--
> drivers/iommu/sprd-iommu.c | 6 --
> drivers/iommu/sun50i-iommu.c | 12 +--
> drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c | 8 --
> include/linux/dma-iommu.h | 9 ++-
> include/linux/iommu.h | 15 +++-
> 18 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 226 deletions(-)
I ran with:
a) mainline Linux (at commit 4010a528219e)
b) pulled iommu/next (at commit 9be9f5580ab6)
c) picked from patchwork your series
...and I ran on sc7180-trogdor-lazor.
Things worked OK and I could transition my eMMC to non-strict mode with:
echo DMA-FQ > /sys/devices/platform/soc@...c4000.sdhci/iommu_group/type
I was definitely getting some inconsistencies in my tests where the
eMMC speeds were getting into a bad state, but I don't believe it's
related to your patch series. I could transition myself back to strict
DMA with this (only got one unrelated warn splat about
dev_pm_opp_put_clkname when unbinding) because I was booted up from
USB for testing:
cd /sys/bus/mmc/drivers/mmcblk
echo mmc1:0001 > unbind
cd /sys/bus/platform/drivers/sdhci_msm/
echo 7c4000.sdhci > unbind
echo DMA > /sys/devices/platform/soc@...c4000.sdhci/iommu_group/type
echo 7c4000.sdhci > bind
...and it was consistently faster with non-strict than with strict so
whatever bad state I sometimes managed to get in it affected both
modes. ;-)
So I guess that's a long-winded way to say this:
Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists