[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <97C4FA94-B28A-4F0E-9CD3-4E33B01BA353@fw-web.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:40:30 +0200
From: Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>
To: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
CC: "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: mmsys: mediatek: add mask to mmsys routes
Am 29. Juli 2021 05:15:23 MESZ schrieb Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>:
>This patch is breaking the mt8183 internal display. I think it's
>because ~routes[i].val; is removed?
>Also what should the routes[i].mask be if it's not set in
>mmsys_mt8183_routing_table?
>
>> writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs +
>routes[i].addr);
>> }
>> }
><snip>
The mask should reset the needed bits,maybe it needs to be adjusted for your ddp components...
Can you add some debugs inside loops in mtk_mmsys_ddp_connect and mtk_mmsys_ddp_disconnect (show read val,mask and final mask before write) to show differences before and after the patch?
regards Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists