[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMZfGtXmNSg2mNsdG20JDzZofMSdreYOiKCO1WQ+zAEomkozyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:00:28 +0800
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
"Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Chen Huang <chenhuang5@...wei.com>,
"Bodeddula, Balasubramaniam" <bodeddub@...zon.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
fam.zheng@...edance.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: introduce PAGEFLAGS_MASK to replace ((1UL <<
NR_PAGEFLAGS) - 1)
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 2:27 PM Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 5:04 AM Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 7/14/21 2:17 AM, Muchun Song wrote:
> > > Instead of hard-coding ((1UL << NR_PAGEFLAGS) - 1) everywhere, introducing
> > > PAGEFLAGS_MASK to make the code clear to get the page flags.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/page-flags.h | 4 +++-
> > > include/trace/events/page_ref.h | 4 ++--
> > > lib/test_printf.c | 2 +-
> > > lib/vsprintf.c | 2 +-
> > > 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> > > index 5922031ffab6..358d3f6fa976 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> > > @@ -178,6 +178,8 @@ enum pageflags {
> > > PG_reported = PG_uptodate,
> > > };
> > >
> > > +#define PAGEFLAGS_MASK (~((1UL << NR_PAGEFLAGS) - 1))
> >
> > Can you explain why you chose this definition instead of
> >
> > #define PAGEFLAGS_MASK ((1UL << NR_PAGEFLAGS) - 1)
> >
> > and mostly use ~PAGEFLAGS_MASK below?
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Actually, I learned from PAGE_MASK. So I thought the macro
> like xxx_MASK should be the format of 0x00...00ff...ff. I don't
^^^
Sorry. I mean 0xff...ff00...00 here.
> know if this is an unwritten rule. Please correct me if I am
> wrong.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > --
> > Mike Kravetz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists