[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR04MB6575579560F7CB1B71103F28FCEB9@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 06:48:24 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: Vincent Palomares <paillon@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Allow async suspend/resume callbacks
> Allow UFS suspend/resume callbacks to run in parallel with other
> suspend/resume callbacks. This can recoup dozens of milliseconds on the
> resume path if UFS hardware needs to be powered back on.
>
> Suspending and resuming asynchronously is safe to do so long as the driver
> callbacks only depend on resources made available by either a) parent
> devices or b) devices explicitly marked as suppliers with device_link_add.
>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
> Cc: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
> Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Palomares <paillon@...gle.com>
> ---
>
> Are there any suspend/resume dependencies for UFS drivers not tracked by
> the device parent relationship?
>
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index b87ff68aa9aa..9ec5c308a0ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -9625,6 +9625,7 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem
> *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
> async_schedule(ufshcd_async_scan, hba);
> ufs_sysfs_add_nodes(hba->dev);
>
> + device_enable_async_suspend(dev);
> return 0;
Isn't device_enable_async_suspend is being called for each lun in scsi_sysfs_add_sdev Anyway?
Thanks,
Avri
>
> free_tmf_queue:
> --
> 2.32.0.432.gabb21c7263-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists