[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQHwa42jixqPPvVm@google.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:03:55 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@...el.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Robert Hu <robert.hu@...el.com>,
Gao Chao <chao.gao@...el.com>,
Robert Hoo <robert.hu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: VMX: Detect Tertiary VM-Execution control when
setup VMCS config
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021, Zeng Guang wrote:
> @@ -4204,6 +4234,13 @@ vmx_adjust_secondary_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u32 *exec_control,
> #define vmx_adjust_sec_exec_exiting(vmx, exec_control, lname, uname) \
> vmx_adjust_sec_exec_control(vmx, exec_control, lname, uname, uname##_EXITING, true)
>
> +static void vmx_compute_tertiary_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> +{
> + u32 exec_control = vmcs_config.cpu_based_3rd_exec_ctrl;
This is incorrectly truncating the value.
> +
> + vmx->tertiary_exec_control = exec_control;
> +}
> +
> static void vmx_compute_secondary_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> {
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &vmx->vcpu;
> @@ -4319,6 +4356,11 @@ static void init_vmcs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> secondary_exec_controls_set(vmx, vmx->secondary_exec_control);
> }
>
> + if (cpu_has_tertiary_exec_ctrls()) {
> + vmx_compute_tertiary_exec_control(vmx);
> + tertiary_exec_controls_set(vmx, vmx->tertiary_exec_control);
IMO, the existing vmx->secondary_exec_control is an abomination that should not
exist. Looking at the code, it's actually not hard to get rid, there's just one
annoying use in prepare_vmcs02_early() that requires a bit of extra work to get
rid of.
Anyways, for tertiary controls, I'd prefer to avoid the same mess and instead
follow vmx_exec_control(), both in functionality and in name:
static u64 vmx_tertiary_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
{
return vmcs_config.cpu_based_3rd_exec_ctrl;
}
and:
if (cpu_has_tertiary_exec_ctrls())
tertiary_exec_controls_set(vmx, vmx_tertiary_exec_control(vmx));
and then the next patch becomes:
static u64 vmx_tertiary_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
{
u64 exec_control = vmcs_config.cpu_based_3rd_exec_ctrl;
if (!kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
exec_control &= ~TERTIARY_EXEC_IPI_VIRT;
return exec_control;
}
And I'll work on a patch to purge vmx->secondary_exec_control.
> + }
> +
> if (kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(&vmx->vcpu)) {
> vmcs_write64(EOI_EXIT_BITMAP0, 0);
> vmcs_write64(EOI_EXIT_BITMAP1, 0);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> index 945c6639ce24..c356ceebe84c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ struct vcpu_vmx {
> u32 msr_ia32_umwait_control;
>
> u32 secondary_exec_control;
> + u64 tertiary_exec_control;
>
> /*
> * loaded_vmcs points to the VMCS currently used in this vcpu. For a
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists