[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7f90fe0-ee24-a47d-089d-e716a5766fcd@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:14:40 -0400
From: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Cc: martin.botka@...ainline.org,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, jamipkettunen@...ainline.org,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/39] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: Add TSENS node
On 7/29/21 6:55 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
> On 29.07.2021 12:54, Thara Gopinath wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/29/21 6:52 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29.07.2021 12:50, Thara Gopinath wrote:
>>>> Hi Konrad,
>>>>
>>>> On 7/28/21 6:25 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>> This will enable temperature reporting for various SoC
>>>>> components.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml | 1 +
>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++
>>>>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
>>>>> index 4a2eaf28e3fd..d3b9e9b600a2 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
>>>>> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ properties:
>>>>> - qcom,sc7180-tsens
>>>>> - qcom,sc7280-tsens
>>>>> - qcom,sc8180x-tsens
>>>>> + - qcom,sdm630-tsens
>>>>> - qcom,sdm845-tsens
>>>>> - qcom,sm8150-tsens
>>>>> - qcom,sm8250-tsens
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
>>>>> index 1e54828817d5..7e9c80e35fba 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -627,6 +627,17 @@ mnoc: interconnect@...5000 {
>>>>> <&mmcc AHB_CLK_SRC>;
>>>>> };
>>>>> + tsens: thermal-sensor@...e000 {
>>>>> + compatible = "qcom,sdm630-tsens", "qcom,tsens-v2";
>>>>> + reg = <0x010ae000 0x1000>, /* TM */
>>>>> + <0x010ad000 0x1000>; /* SROT */
>>>>> + #qcom,sensors = <12>;
>>>>
>>>> Are all 12 sensors used ? I see that in a later patch "arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: Add thermal-zones configuration" only 9 are used.
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> if I recall correctly, they all give output but not all of the mappings were documented in the downstream sources and we have no documentation whatsoever :(
>>
>> Right. In that case, why not change #qcom,sensors to 9 and add rest of the sensors if and when needed ?
>>
> I don't think it makes sense to describe the hardware incorrectly, even if some of it is unused.
My thinking was more along the lines of don't expose unused h/w bits.
>
>
>
--
Warm Regards
Thara (She/Her/Hers)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists