linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] kfence: add function to mask address bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:43:51 +0200
From:   Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To:     Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] kfence: add function to mask address bits

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 9:03 PM Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> From: Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> s390 only reports the page address during a translation fault.
> To make the kfence unit tests pass, add a function that might
> be implemented by architectures to mask out address bits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  mm/kfence/kfence_test.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kfence/kfence_test.c b/mm/kfence/kfence_test.c
> index 942cbc16ad26..eb6307c199ea 100644
> --- a/mm/kfence/kfence_test.c
> +++ b/mm/kfence/kfence_test.c
> @@ -23,8 +23,15 @@
>  #include <linux/tracepoint.h>
>  #include <trace/events/printk.h>
>
> +#include <asm/kfence.h>
> +
>  #include "kfence.h"
>
> +/* May be overridden by <asm/kfence.h>. */
> +#ifndef arch_kfence_test_address
> +#define arch_kfence_test_address(addr) (addr)
> +#endif
> +
>  /* Report as observed from console. */
>  static struct {
>         spinlock_t lock;
> @@ -82,6 +89,7 @@ static const char *get_access_type(const struct expect_report *r)
>  /* Check observed report matches information in @r. */
>  static bool report_matches(const struct expect_report *r)
>  {
> +       unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)r->addr;
>         bool ret = false;
>         unsigned long flags;
>         typeof(observed.lines) expect;
> @@ -131,22 +139,25 @@ static bool report_matches(const struct expect_report *r)
>         switch (r->type) {
>         case KFENCE_ERROR_OOB:
>                 cur += scnprintf(cur, end - cur, "Out-of-bounds %s at", get_access_type(r));
> +               addr = arch_kfence_test_address(addr);

Can we normalize addr once before (or after) this switch?

>                 break;
>         case KFENCE_ERROR_UAF:
>                 cur += scnprintf(cur, end - cur, "Use-after-free %s at", get_access_type(r));
> +               addr = arch_kfence_test_address(addr);
>                 break;
>         case KFENCE_ERROR_CORRUPTION:
>                 cur += scnprintf(cur, end - cur, "Corrupted memory at");
>                 break;
>         case KFENCE_ERROR_INVALID:
>                 cur += scnprintf(cur, end - cur, "Invalid %s at", get_access_type(r));
> +               addr = arch_kfence_test_address(addr);
>                 break;
>         case KFENCE_ERROR_INVALID_FREE:
>                 cur += scnprintf(cur, end - cur, "Invalid free of");
>                 break;
>         }
>
> -       cur += scnprintf(cur, end - cur, " 0x%p", (void *)r->addr);
> +       cur += scnprintf(cur, end - cur, " 0x%p", (void *)addr);
>
>         spin_lock_irqsave(&observed.lock, flags);
>         if (!report_available())
> --
> 2.25.1
>


-- 
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer

Google Germany GmbH
Erika-Mann-Straße, 33
80636 München

Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg