linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 08/24] net/802/garp: fix memleak in garp_request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210729135137.529502517@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:54:28 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>,
        Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 08/24] net/802/garp: fix memleak in garp_request_join()

From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit 42ca63f980842918560b25f0244307fd83b4777c ]

I got kmemleak report when doing fuzz test:

BUG: memory leak
unreferenced object 0xffff88810c909b80 (size 64):
  comm "syz", pid 957, jiffies 4295220394 (age 399.090s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 00 00 00 01 02 00 04  ................
  backtrace:
    [<00000000ca1f2e2e>] garp_request_join+0x285/0x3d0
    [<00000000bf153351>] vlan_gvrp_request_join+0x15b/0x190
    [<0000000024005e72>] vlan_dev_open+0x706/0x980
    [<00000000dc20c4d4>] __dev_open+0x2bb/0x460
    [<0000000066573004>] __dev_change_flags+0x501/0x650
    [<0000000035b42f83>] rtnl_configure_link+0xee/0x280
    [<00000000a5e69de0>] __rtnl_newlink+0xed5/0x1550
    [<00000000a5258f4a>] rtnl_newlink+0x66/0x90
    [<00000000506568ee>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x439/0xbd0
    [<00000000b7eaeae1>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x14d/0x420
    [<00000000c373ce66>] netlink_unicast+0x550/0x750
    [<00000000ec74ce74>] netlink_sendmsg+0x88b/0xda0
    [<00000000381ff246>] sock_sendmsg+0xc9/0x120
    [<000000008f6a2db3>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x6e8/0x820
    [<000000008d9c1735>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x145/0x1c0
    [<00000000aa39dd8b>] __sys_sendmsg+0xfe/0x1d0

Calling garp_request_leave() after garp_request_join(), the attr->state
is set to GARP_APPLICANT_VO, garp_attr_destroy() won't be called in last
transmit event in garp_uninit_applicant(), the attr of applicant will be
leaked. To fix this leak, iterate and free each attr of applicant before
rerturning from garp_uninit_applicant().

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/802/garp.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/802/garp.c b/net/802/garp.c
index 400bd857e5f5..f6012f8e59f0 100644
--- a/net/802/garp.c
+++ b/net/802/garp.c
@@ -203,6 +203,19 @@ static void garp_attr_destroy(struct garp_applicant *app, struct garp_attr *attr
 	kfree(attr);
 }
 
+static void garp_attr_destroy_all(struct garp_applicant *app)
+{
+	struct rb_node *node, *next;
+	struct garp_attr *attr;
+
+	for (node = rb_first(&app->gid);
+	     next = node ? rb_next(node) : NULL, node != NULL;
+	     node = next) {
+		attr = rb_entry(node, struct garp_attr, node);
+		garp_attr_destroy(app, attr);
+	}
+}
+
 static int garp_pdu_init(struct garp_applicant *app)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
@@ -609,6 +622,7 @@ void garp_uninit_applicant(struct net_device *dev, struct garp_application *appl
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&app->lock);
 	garp_gid_event(app, GARP_EVENT_TRANSMIT_PDU);
+	garp_attr_destroy_all(app);
 	garp_pdu_queue(app);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&app->lock);
 
-- 
2.30.2