linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9f371091-7f73-8f60-e537-166984c650c1@amd.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jul 2021 09:24:34 -0500
From:   Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com,
        amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()

On 7/28/21 8:22 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:26:05PM -0500, Tom Lendacky via iommu wrote:
>> Introduce an x86 version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will be
>> used in the more generic x86 code to replace vendor specific calls like
>> sev_active(), etc.
>>
>> While the name suggests this is intended mainly for guests, it will
>> also be used for host memory encryption checks in place of sme_active().
>>
>> The amd_prot_guest_has() function does not use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the
>> same reasons previously stated when changing sme_active(), sev_active and
> 
> None of that applies here as none of the callers get pulled into
> random macros.  The only case of that is sme_me_mask through
> sme_mask, but that's not something this series replaces as far as I can
> tell.

Ok, let me make sure of that and I'll change to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL if
that's the case.

Thanks,
Tom

>