linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] eventfd: Make signal recursion protection a task bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ebcc02b-4d42-ce69-c515-f27ce4db118c@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jul 2021 16:32:40 +0200
From:   Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Juri Lelli <jlelli@...hat.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        He Zhe <zhe.he@...driver.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eventfd: Make signal recursion protection a task bit

On 7/29/21 1:01 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The recursion protection for eventfd_signal() is based on a per CPU
> variable and relies on the !RT semantics of spin_lock_irqsave() for
> protecting this per CPU variable. On RT kernels spin_lock_irqsave() neither
> disables preemption nor interrupts which allows the spin lock held section
> to be preempted. If the preempting task invokes eventfd_signal() as well,
> then the recursion warning triggers.
> 
> Paolo suggested to protect the per CPU variable with a local lock, but
> that's heavyweight and actually not necessary. The goal of this protection
> is to prevent the task stack from overflowing, which can be achieved with a
> per task recursion protection as well.
> 
> Replace the per CPU variable with a per task bit similar to other recursion
> protection bits like task_struct::in_page_owner. This works on both !RT and
> RT kernels and removes as a side effect the extra per CPU storage.
> 
> No functional change for !RT kernels.
> 
> Reported-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

Testing....

Thanks!
-- Daniel