linux-kernel - Re: Leveraging pidfs for process creation without fork

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:54:08 -0400
From:   "John Ericson" <list@...nericson.me>
To:     "Christian Brauner" <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
        "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        "Kernel Hardening" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        "Jann Horn" <jann@...jh.net>,
        "Christian Brauner" <christian.brauner@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: Leveraging pidfs for process creation without fork

Wonderful, looking forward to it reading it then!

John

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021, at 10:24 AM, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 12:37:57PM -0400, John Cotton Ericson wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I was excited to learn about about pidfds the other day, precisely in hopes
> > that it would open the door to such a "sane process creation API". I
> > searched the LKML, found this thread, and now hope to rekindle the
> > discussion; my apologies if there has been more discussion since that I
> 
> Yeah, I haven't forgotten this discussion. A proposal is on my todo list
> for this year. So far I've scheduled some time to work on this in the
> fall.
> 
> Thanks!
> Christian