[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQLRsNjn/lQwiIcl@osiris>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:05:04 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kcsan: use u64 instead of cycles_t
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 08:58:34AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 04:53:10PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > +Cc: Paul
> >
> > On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 16:28, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > cycles_t has a different type across architectures: unsigned int,
> > > unsinged long, or unsigned long long. Depending on architecture this
> > > will generate this warning:
> > >
> > > kernel/kcsan/debugfs.c: In function ‘microbenchmark’:
> > > ./include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:25: warning: format ‘%llu’ expects argument of type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘cycles_t’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’} [-Wformat=]
> > >
> > > To avoid this simple change the type of cycle to u64 in
> > > microbenchmark(), since u64 is of type unsigned long long for all
> > > architectures.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> >
> > Do you have a series adding KCSAN support for s390, i.e. would you
> > like to keep it together with those changes?
> >
> > Otherwise this would go the usual route through Paul's -rcu tree.
>
> Either way, please let me know!
We will enable KCSAN support for s390 with the next merge window, so
I'll queue this patch also on the s390 tree.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists