[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e6d103f1-f8ee-cad9-c7c0-c9ea5d0f099a@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:26:40 +0200
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: Fix reset_on_fork reporting of DL
tasks
On 27/07/2021 12:11, Quentin Perret wrote:
> It is possible for sched_getattr() to incorrectly report the state of
> the reset_on_fork flag when called on a deadline task.
>
> Indeed, if the flag was set on a deadline task using sched_setattr()
> with flags (SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FORK | SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS), then
> p->sched_reset_on_fork will be set, but __setscheduler() will bail out
> early, which means that the dl_se->flags will not get updated by
> __setscheduler_params()->__setparam_dl(). Consequently, if
True, but it would also be awkward if non-DL related flags would have to
be stored in dl_se->flags.
> sched_getattr() is then called on the task, __getparam_dl() will
> override kattr.sched_flags with the now out-of-date copy in dl_se->flags
> and report the stale value to userspace.
>
> To fix this, make sure to only copy the flags that are relevant to
> sched_deadline to and from the dl_se->flags field.
It also fixes the 'hidden' issue that a
uclampset -mX -MY -p dl_task
would end up at 'change:' label because of
dl_se->flags != attr->sched_flags
and not because of
attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP
And it also unblocks the uclamp-dl issue raised in
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ad30be79-8fb2-023d-9936-01f7173164e4@arm.com
which surfaced when using `get_params()->__getparam_dl()` in
SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sched_setattr,...).
Just for reference, IIRC, you mentioned this already on irc.
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists