[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210730052355.77289-1-someguy@effective-light.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 01:23:55 -0400
From: Hamza Mahfooz <someguy@...ective-light.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Hamza Mahfooz <someguy@...ective-light.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] apparmor: use per file locks for transactional queries
As made mention of in commit 1dea3b41e84c5 ("apparmor: speed up
transactional queries"), a single lock is currently used to synchronize
transactional queries. We can, use the lock allocated for each file by
VFS instead.
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <someguy@...ective-light.com>
---
security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c b/security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c
index 2ee3b3d29f10..c0b626a271a0 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c
@@ -812,8 +812,6 @@ struct multi_transaction {
};
#define MULTI_TRANSACTION_LIMIT (PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(struct multi_transaction))
-/* TODO: replace with per file lock */
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(multi_transaction_lock);
static void multi_transaction_kref(struct kref *kref)
{
@@ -847,10 +845,10 @@ static void multi_transaction_set(struct file *file,
AA_BUG(n > MULTI_TRANSACTION_LIMIT);
new->size = n;
- spin_lock(&multi_transaction_lock);
+ spin_lock(&file->f_lock);
old = (struct multi_transaction *) file->private_data;
file->private_data = new;
- spin_unlock(&multi_transaction_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&file->f_lock);
put_multi_transaction(old);
}
@@ -879,9 +877,10 @@ static ssize_t multi_transaction_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
struct multi_transaction *t;
ssize_t ret;
- spin_lock(&multi_transaction_lock);
+ spin_lock(&file->f_lock);
t = get_multi_transaction(file->private_data);
- spin_unlock(&multi_transaction_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&file->f_lock);
+
if (!t)
return 0;
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists