linux-kernel - [PATCH] iio: adc: Fix incorrect exit of for-loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210730071651.17394-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:16:51 +0100
From:   Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        Pradeep Goudagunta <pgoudagunta@...dia.com>,
        Marek Belisko <marek@...delico.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] iio: adc: Fix incorrect exit of for-loop

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

Currently the for-loop that scans for the optimial adc_period iterates
through all the possible adc_period levels because the exit logic in
the loop is inverted. I believe the comparison should be swapped and
the continue replaced with a break to exit the loop at the correct
point.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Continue has no effect")
Fixes: e08e19c331fb ("iio:adc: add iio driver for Palmas (twl6035/7) gpadc")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/iio/adc/palmas_gpadc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/palmas_gpadc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/palmas_gpadc.c
index 6ef09609be9f..f9c8385c72d3 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/palmas_gpadc.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/palmas_gpadc.c
@@ -664,8 +664,8 @@ static int palmas_adc_wakeup_configure(struct palmas_gpadc *adc)
 
 	adc_period = adc->auto_conversion_period;
 	for (i = 0; i < 16; ++i) {
-		if (((1000 * (1 << i)) / 32) < adc_period)
-			continue;
+		if (((1000 * (1 << i)) / 32) >= adc_period)
+			break;
 	}
 	if (i > 0)
 		i--;
-- 
2.31.1