[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4bf6cd58adb5411e989530e1443f9698@baidu.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:16:54 +0000
From: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@...du.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"juri.lelli@...hat.com" <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"dietmar.eggemann@....com" <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"bsegall@...gle.com" <bsegall@...gle.com>,
"mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>,
"bristot@...hat.co" <bristot@...hat.co>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"songmuchun@...edance.com" <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: 答复: [PATCH][RFC] sched/cpuacct: Fix cpuacct charge
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> 发送时间: 2021年7月29日 18:20
> 收件人: Li,Rongqing <lirongqing@...du.com>
> 抄送: mingo@...hat.com; juri.lelli@...hat.com; vincent.guittot@...aro.org;
> dietmar.eggemann@....com; rostedt@...dmis.org; bsegall@...gle.com;
> mgorman@...e.de; bristot@...hat.co; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> songmuchun@...edance.com
> 主题: Re: [PATCH][RFC] sched/cpuacct: Fix cpuacct charge
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 02:04:41PM +0800, Li RongQing wrote:
> > get_irq_regs only work for current running cpu, but the task, whose
> > cpuacct will be charged, maybe run different cpu, like Cpu 2 wake up a
> > kernel thread to CPU 3, cause CPU 3 task are charged with the
> > following stack
> >
> > cpuacct_charge+0xd8/0x100
> > update_curr+0xe1/0x1e0
> > enqueue_entity+0x144/0x6e0
> > enqueue_task_fair+0x93/0x900
> > ttwu_do_activate+0x4b/0x90
> > try_to_wake_up+0x20b/0x530
> > ? update_dl_rq_load_avg+0x10f/0x210
> > swake_up_locked.part.1+0x13/0x40
> > swake_up_one+0x27/0x40
> > rcu_process_callbacks+0x484/0x4f0
> > ? run_rebalance_domains_bt+0x5a/0x180
> > __do_softirq+0xe3/0x308
> > irq_exit+0xf0/0x100
> > smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x74/0x160
> > apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20
> > </IRQ>
> > RIP: 0033:0x456947
> >
> > so define a get_irq_regs_cpu which returns the required cpu irq
> > registers
> >
> > BUT it should be not safe, and do not know what it should be like in MIPS?
> >
> > Fixes: dbe9337109c2 "(sched/cpuacct: Fix charge cpuacct.usage_sys)"
> > Co-developed-by: Zhao Jie <zhaojie17@...du.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Zhao Jie <zhaojie17@...du.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
> > ---
> > include/asm-generic/irq_regs.h | 5 +++++
> > kernel/sched/cpuacct.c | 3 ++-
> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/irq_regs.h
> > b/include/asm-generic/irq_regs.h index 2e7c6e8..93e2579 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/irq_regs.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/irq_regs.h
> > @@ -21,6 +21,11 @@ static inline struct pt_regs *get_irq_regs(void)
> > return __this_cpu_read(__irq_regs);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline struct pt_regs *get_irq_regs_cpu(int cpu) {
> > + return per_cpu(__irq_regs, cpu);
> > +}
>
> This primitive just cannot be right... it'll get you some random data.
True
Seem no easy to fix. How about a partial fix
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c b/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c
index 893eece..48b117e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c
@@ -340,7 +340,12 @@ void cpuacct_charge(struct task_struct *tsk, u64 cputime)
{
struct cpuacct *ca;
int index = CPUACCT_STAT_SYSTEM;
- struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs() ? : task_pt_regs(tsk);
+ struct pt_regs *regs;
+
+ if (task_cpu(tsk) == raw_smp_processor_id())
+ regs = get_irq_regs() ? : task_pt_regs(tsk);
+ else
+ regs = task_pt_regs(tsk);
if (regs && user_mode(regs))
index = CPUACCT_STAT_USER;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists