linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Check if guest is allowed to use XMM registers for hypercall input

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210730122625.112848-4-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:26:24 +0200
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Siddharth Chandrasekaran <sidcha@...zon.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Check if guest is allowed to use XMM registers for hypercall input

TLFS states that "Availability of the XMM fast hypercall interface is
indicated via the “Hypervisor Feature Identification” CPUID Leaf
(0x40000003, see section 2.4.4) ... Any attempt to use this interface
when the hypervisor does not indicate availability will result in a #UD
fault."

Implement the check for 'strict' mode (KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENFORCE_CPUID).

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
index 2945b93dbadd..0b38f944c6b6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
@@ -2140,6 +2140,7 @@ static bool hv_check_hypercall_access(struct kvm_vcpu_hv *hv_vcpu, u16 code)
 
 int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	struct kvm_vcpu_hv *hv_vcpu = to_hv_vcpu(vcpu);
 	struct kvm_hv_hcall hc;
 	u64 ret = HV_STATUS_SUCCESS;
 
@@ -2177,13 +2178,21 @@ int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	trace_kvm_hv_hypercall(hc.code, hc.fast, hc.rep_cnt, hc.rep_idx,
 			       hc.ingpa, hc.outgpa);
 
-	if (unlikely(!hv_check_hypercall_access(to_hv_vcpu(vcpu), hc.code))) {
+	if (unlikely(!hv_check_hypercall_access(hv_vcpu, hc.code))) {
 		ret = HV_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED;
 		goto hypercall_complete;
 	}
 
-	if (hc.fast && is_xmm_fast_hypercall(&hc))
+	if (hc.fast && is_xmm_fast_hypercall(&hc)) {
+		if (unlikely(hv_vcpu->enforce_cpuid &&
+			     !(hv_vcpu->cpuid_cache.features_edx &
+			       HV_X64_HYPERCALL_XMM_INPUT_AVAILABLE))) {
+			kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
+			return 1;
+		}
+
 		kvm_hv_hypercall_read_xmm(&hc);
+	}
 
 	switch (hc.code) {
 	case HVCALL_NOTIFY_LONG_SPIN_WAIT:
-- 
2.31.1