[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0h6w9GCZjOcVwHg4ZWy5hOT61x1w=d6Q2ExVnf=T4gZBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 15:25:15 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] cpuidle: teo: Rework the idle state selection logic
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 5:36 AM Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 9:14 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> >
> ... [snip]...
> >
> > This means that idle state 0 data are disregarded after disabling it
> > and that most likely is because the second loop in teo_select() should
> > be over all states down to idle state 0 (not only down to the first
> > enabled one).
> >
> > So below is an updated patch (not tested yet).
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> This updated patch works great / solves the problem.
> Tested-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
>
> Thank you very much.
Thank you and you're welcome!
I've found a small issue in the patch though (it needs to check the
time span before setting the "last enabled" index), so let me submit a
proper patch with a changelog based on this one.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists