linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] ASoC: Intel: kbl_da7219_max98357a: fix drv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:05:19 +0200
From:   Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Lukasz Majczak <lma@...ihalf.com>
Cc:     upstream@...ihalf.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ASoC: Intel: kbl_da7219_max98357a: fix drv_name

On 2021-07-30 3:55 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 7/30/21 6:59 AM, Lukasz Majczak wrote:

...

>> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ struct snd_soc_acpi_mach snd_soc_acpi_intel_kbl_machines[] = {
>>   	},
>>   	{
>>   		.id = "DLGS7219",
>> -		.drv_name = "kbl_da7219_mx98373",
>> +		.drv_name = "kbl_da7219_max98373",
> 
> this one is wrong though? The correct name was already present, you're
> reverting back to the wrong name.
> 
> there's another one that I missed, do you mind changing this as well?
> 
> soc-acpi-intel-cml-match.c:             .drv_name = "cml_da7219_max98357a",
> 
> Should be "cml_da7219_mx98357a"
> 
> 

Not saying 'nay' or 'yay' but why is configuration first available on 
KBL platforms being renamed to 'cml_XXX'?

Czarek