[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210730135206.472475934@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 15:50:30 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: [patch 23/63] locking/rtmutex: Prevent future include recursion hell
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
rtmutex only needs raw_spinlock_t, but it includes spinlock_types.h which
is not a problem on an non RT enabled kernel.
RT kernels substitute regular spinlocks with 'sleeping' spinlocks which
are based on rtmutexes and therefore must be able to include rtmutex.h.
Include spinlock_types_raw.h instead.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
include/linux/rtmutex.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
--- a/include/linux/rtmutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/rtmutex.h
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/linkage.h>
#include <linux/rbtree.h>
-#include <linux/spinlock_types.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock_types_raw.h>
extern int max_lock_depth; /* for sysctl */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists