[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9bb0e700-eb12-af14-76d6-3a90d434339b@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 15:33:18 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add thermal fan control to
rockpro64
Hi Peter,
On 2021-07-30 15:02, Peter Geis wrote:
> The rockpro64 had a fan node since
> commit 5882d65c1691 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add PWM fan for RockPro64")
> however it was never tied into the thermal driver for automatic control.
>
> Add the links to the thermal node to permit the kernel to handle this
> automatically.
> Borrowed from the (rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi).
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
> ---
>
> Changelog:
> v2:
> Adjusted fan setpoints for less noise
>
> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
> index 6bff8db7d33e..0d79e6ae1c3a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ diy_led: led-1 {
>
> fan: pwm-fan {
> compatible = "pwm-fan";
> + cooling-levels = <0 100 150 200 255>;
> #cooling-cells = <2>;
> fan-supply = <&vcc12v_dcin>;
> pwms = <&pwm1 0 50000 0>;
> @@ -245,6 +246,34 @@ &cpu_b1 {
> cpu-supply = <&vdd_cpu_b>;
> };
>
> +&cpu_thermal {
> + trips {
> + cpu_warm: cpu_warm {
> + temperature = <55000>;
> + hysteresis = <2000>;
> + type = "active";
> + };
(Heh, it still tickles me to see these points I arbitrarily made up
being faithfully copied around - I guess that means I got them right!)
> +
> + cpu_hot: cpu_hot {
> + temperature = <65000>;
> + hysteresis = <2000>;
> + type = "active";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + cooling-maps {
> + map2 {
> + trip = <&cpu_warm>;
> + cooling-device = <&fan THERMAL_NO_LIMIT 1>;
> + };
> +
> + map3 {
> + trip = <&cpu_hot>;
> + cooling-device = <&fan 2 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>;
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> &emmc_phy {
> status = "okay";
> };
> @@ -281,6 +310,34 @@ &gpu {
> status = "okay";
> };
>
> +&gpu_thermal {
> + trips {
> + gpu_warm: gpu_warm {
> + temperature = <55000>;
> + hysteresis = <2000>;
> + type = "active";
> + };
> +
> + gpu_hot: gpu_hot {
> + temperature = <65000>;
> + hysteresis = <2000>;
> + type = "active";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + cooling-maps {
> + map1 {
> + trip = <&gpu_warm>;
> + cooling-device = <&fan THERMAL_NO_LIMIT 1>;
> + };
> +
> + map2 {
> + trip = <&gpu_hot>;
> + cooling-device = <&fan 2 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>;
> + };
> + };
> +};
Unless something's changed since commit a793e19c15f2 ("arm64: dts:
rockchip: Fix NanoPC-T4 cooling maps"), multiple cooling maps don't
actually share a singe cooling device properly[1]. The Khadas Edge DT
dates from right around the same time so I guess it crossed over with
that discussion and never got fixed.
In hindsight, I do seem to remember my fan being a bit more jumpy around
the trip points than it is today, which may well have been the two maps
fighting each other...
Robin.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/55b9018e-672e-522b-d0a0-c5655be0f353@linaro.org/
> +
> &i2c0 {
> clock-frequency = <400000>;
> i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <168>;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists