[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01aaa72f-f4c8-720d-e51b-df38f200eeaf@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:47:22 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: 苏辉(Robert Su) <suhui@...u.com>,
"fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 回复: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: use __this_cpu_read in pseudo_lock_fn()
Hi,
On 7/30/2021 1:22 AM, 苏辉(Robert Su) wrote:
> Hi, Reinette:
>
> There is no issue here, i just think it's better to use __this_cpu_read when
> interrupt disabled.
ok, could you please elaborate why it is better? I do not see a problem
with the change - I would just like to understand the motivation for it.
Thank you
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists