[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210730025544.GA12781@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 10:55:44 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
brendanhiggins@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 1/2] crypto: tcrypt: minimal conversion to run under
KUnit
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 12:31:28PM -0700, Daniel Latypov wrote:
>
> Thanks, that makes a lot of sense.
> In that case, how useful would `kunit.py run` be? I.e. Do people
> mostly want to see numbers on bare metal?
I think it's a mix of both. As in performance on bare metal and
under virtualisation may be of interest. I don't think you're going
to be going through kunit for the speed tests though, because you
need to supply module parameters for tcrypt to do that.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists