[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210730173203.518307-1-dqfext@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 01:32:03 +0800
From: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/2] net: dsa: tag_mtk: skip address learning on transmit to standalone ports
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 07:24:03PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Considering that you also have the option of setting
> ds->assisted_learning_on_cpu_port = true and this will have less false
> positives, what are the reasons why you did not choose that approach?
You're right. Hardware learning on CPU port does have some limitations.
I have been testing a multi CPU ports patch, and assisted learning has
to be used, because FDB entries should be installed like multicast
ones, which point to all CPU ports.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists