[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f09e323b-90f3-8fd6-e5ba-e3c5ac823dc6@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2021 13:29:50 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Samin Guo <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] hwmon: Add StarFive JH7100 temperature sensor
On 8/1/21 1:19 PM, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 19:05, Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk> wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 18:54, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>>> On 7/26/21 10:18 AM, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
>>>> This adds a driver for the temperature sensor on the JH7100, a RISC-V
>>>> SoC by StarFive Technology Co. Ltd., and most likely also the upcoming
>>>> JH7110 version.
>>>>
>>>> The SoC is used on the BeagleV Starlight board:
>>>> https://github.com/beagleboard/beaglev-starlight
>>>>
>>>> Support for this SoC is not yet upstreamed, but is actively worked on,
>>>> so it should only be a matter of time before that happens.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hmm, makes me wonder if I should apply the series now or later,
>>> when the chip is actually supported by the kernel. Comments/thoughts ?
>>>
>>> Guenter
>>
>> I'd of course love if it was applied now. That would at least mean
>> fewer patches to rebase when keeping the beaglev patches [1] up to
>> date, and I'd be very surprised if SoC support doesn't make it
>> upstream eventually. But I'd also fully understand the position that
>> this only makes sense to add when support for the SoC is upstream too.
>> I'm adding Drew, as he might have something to say about this.
>
> Hi Guenter,
>
> Things have changed. The BeagleBoard.org foundation is no longer
> planning to make any further boards using the JH7100 or upcoming
> JH7110 SoCs from StarFive. I still think support for the JH7100 will
> make it upstream eventually, but I'm no longer confident enough to
> recommend merging this before there are more concrete plans for the
> SoC. So thanks for the reviews. I'll repost it when I think it's time
> to consider it for upstream again.
>
Thanks for the update.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists