linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] drm/panel: Add support for E Ink VB3300-KCA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 1 Aug 2021 10:48:31 +1000
From:   Alistair Francis <alistair23@...il.com>
To:     Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:     Alistair Francis <alistair@...stair23.me>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>, linux@...pel-privat.de,
        kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com, max.Merchel@...group.com,
        geert+renesas@...der.be, airlied@...ux.ie,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/panel: Add support for E Ink VB3300-KCA

On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 4:26 AM Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Alistair,
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 10:13:10PM +1000, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > Add support for the 10.3" E Ink panel described at:
> > https://www.eink.com/product.html?type=productdetail&id=7
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair@...stair23.me>
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> > ---
> > v5:
> >  - Add .connector_type
>
> I missed this revision before sending my last mail.
> I tried to apply this patch but every patch confliced due to other
> changes since the kernel this is based on.
>
> I need you to generate a new patch on top of drm-misc-next,
> or as an alternative on top of linux-next.
> You are in a much better position to do this right than I am.
>
> Sorry for the troubles!

No worries! Just sent a v6 rebased on linux-next.

I am never sure if my patches should be based on master or linux-next.
Sorry for the conflicts.

Alistair