linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] s390/vfio-ap: do not open code locks for VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Aug 2021 12:32:12 -0400
From:   Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
        pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, jgg@...dia.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com, david@...hat.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] s390/vfio-ap: do not open code locks for
 VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM notification



On 8/2/21 9:53 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 09:10:26 -0400
> Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> PING!
>>
>> This patch will pre-req version 17 of a patch series I have waiting in
>> the wings,
>> so I'd like to get this one merged ASAP. In particular, if a KVM
>> maintainer can
>> take a look at the comments concerning the taking of the kvm->lock
>> before the
>> matrix_mdev->lock it would be greatly appreciated. Those comments begin with
>> Message ID <20210727004329.3bcc7d4f.pasic@...ux.ibm.com> from Halil Pasic.
> As far as I'm concerned, we can move forward with this. Was this
> supposed to go in via Alex's tree?

I am not certain, Christian queued the previous patches related to
this on:


https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/log/?h=fixes

Jason G., since this will need to be integrated with your other patches,
where should this be queued?

>
>> On 7/19/21 3:35 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>>> This series is actually only comprised of a single patch to replace the
>>> open coded locks used during VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM notification. The
>>> first patch is included because it is a pre-req slotted to be merged but is
>>> not yet available in the kernel.
>>>
>>> Tony Krowiak (2):
>>>     s390/vfio-ap: r/w lock for PQAP interception handler function pointer
>>>     s390/vfio-ap: replace open coded locks for VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM
>>>       notification
>>>
>>>    arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h      |   8 +-
>>>    arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c              |  28 +++++-
>>>    arch/s390/kvm/priv.c                  |  10 +-
>>>    drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c     | 127 +++++++++-----------------
>>>    drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h |   4 +-
>>>    5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)
>>>