[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL715WKVZqHG0sJhTn-ebJKjdj5pUQedL9kJjVRWMWoZGbzHFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 10:25:38 -0700
From: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Marc Orr <marcorr@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Alper Gun <alpergun@...gle.com>,
Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SEV: improve the code readability for ASID management
Hi Paolo,
Thanks. I think Sean's suggestion makes sense. I will update it with
that one and remove the 'fixes' line.
Regards
-Mingwei
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 9:53 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 02/08/21 18:17, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> >
> > Rather than adjusting the bitmap index, what about simply umping the bitmap size?
> > IIRC, current CPUs have 512 ASIDs, counting ASID 0, i.e. bumping the size won't
> > consume any additional memory. And if it does, the cost is 8 bytes...
> >
> > It'd be a bigger refactoring, but it should completely eliminate the mod-by-1
> > shenanigans, e.g. a partial patch could look like
>
> This is also okay by me if Mingwei agrees, of course. I have already
> queued his patch, but I can replace it with one using a nr_asids-sized
> bitmap too.
>
> Paolo
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists