lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQeQfX3t8k+U3MIL@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 2 Aug 2021 08:28:13 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
        Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>,
        Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcg: Fix incorrect flushing of lruvec data in
 obj_stock

On Sun 01-08-21 22:28:27, Waiman Long wrote:
> When mod_objcg_state() is called with a pgdat that is different from
> that in the obj_stock, the old lruvec data cached in obj_stock are
> flushed out. Unfortunately, they were flushed to the new pgdat and
> hence the wrong node, not the one cached in obj_stock.

It would be great to explicitly mention user observable problems here. I
do assume this will make slab stats skewed but the effect wouldn't be
very big, right?

> Fix that by flushing the data to the cached pgdat instead.
> 
> Fixes: 68ac5b3c8db2 ("mm/memcg: cache vmstat data in percpu memcg_stock_pcp")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>

> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index ae1f5d0cb581..881ec4ddddcd 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3106,17 +3106,19 @@ void mod_objcg_state(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>  		stock->cached_pgdat = pgdat;
>  	} else if (stock->cached_pgdat != pgdat) {
>  		/* Flush the existing cached vmstat data */
> +		struct pglist_data *oldpg = stock->cached_pgdat;
> +
> +		stock->cached_pgdat = pgdat;
>  		if (stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b) {
> -			mod_objcg_mlstate(objcg, pgdat, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B,
> +			mod_objcg_mlstate(objcg, oldpg, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B,
>  					  stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b);
>  			stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b = 0;
>  		}
>  		if (stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b) {
> -			mod_objcg_mlstate(objcg, pgdat, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B,
> +			mod_objcg_mlstate(objcg, oldpg, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B,
>  					  stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b);
>  			stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b = 0;
>  		}
> -		stock->cached_pgdat = pgdat;

Minor nit. Is there any reason to move the cached_pgdat? TBH I found the
original way better from the readability POV.

>  	}
>  
>  	bytes = (idx == NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B) ? &stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b
> -- 
> 2.18.1

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ