[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56e4a418-2e33-43f1-45e6-fa1dcc92060f@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 01:18:37 +0300
From: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+02c9f70f3afae308464a@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: pegasus: fix uninit-value in get_interrupt_interval
On 8/2/21 11:07 PM, Petko Manolov wrote:
> On 21-08-01 22:35:13, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 15:36:27 +0300
>> Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 21-07-31 00:44:11, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
>> > > Syzbot reported uninit value pegasus_probe(). The problem was in missing
>> > > error handling.
>> > >
>> > > get_interrupt_interval() internally calls read_eprom_word() which can fail
>> > > in some cases. For example: failed to receive usb control message. These
>> > > cases should be handled to prevent uninit value bug, since
>> > > read_eprom_word() will not initialize passed stack variable in case of
>> > > internal failure.
>> >
>> > Well, this is most definitelly a bug.
>> >
>> > ACK!
>> >
>> >
>> > Petko
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Thank you, Petko!
>>
>>
>> BTW: I found a lot uses of {get,set}_registers without error checking. I
>> think, some of them could be fixed easily (like in enable_eprom_write), but, I
>> guess, disable_eprom_write is not so easy. For example, if we cannot disable
>> eprom should we retry? If not, will device get in some unexpected state?
>>
>> Im not familiar with this device, but I can prepare a patch to wrap all these
>> calls with proper error checking
>
> Here goes a preliminary patch that should apply on top of your, maybe with just
> a few warnings. This is a review only diff, not the real patch. It's against
> 5.14-rc4.
>
> I am mildly curious why syzbot didn't catch the same type of bug in
> enable_net_traffic() and setup_pegasus_II() for example.
>
>
> Petko
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/pegasus.c b/drivers/net/usb/pegasus.c
> index 9a907182569c..eafbe8107907 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/pegasus.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/pegasus.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
> * ...
> * v0.9.3 simplified [get|set]_register(s), async update registers
> * logic revisited, receive skb_pool removed.
> + * v1.0.1 add error checking for set_register(s)(), see if calling
> + * get_registers() has failed and print a message accordingly.
> */
>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> @@ -45,7 +47,7 @@
> /*
> * Version Information
> */
> -#define DRIVER_VERSION "v0.9.3 (2013/04/25)"
> +#define DRIVER_VERSION "v1.0.1 (2021/08/01)"
> #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com>"
> #define DRIVER_DESC "Pegasus/Pegasus II USB Ethernet driver"
>
> @@ -132,9 +134,15 @@ static int get_registers(pegasus_t *pegasus, __u16 indx, __u16 size, void *data)
> static int set_registers(pegasus_t *pegasus, __u16 indx, __u16 size,
> const void *data)
> {
> - return usb_control_msg_send(pegasus->usb, 0, PEGASUS_REQ_SET_REGS,
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = usb_control_msg_send(pegasus->usb, 0, PEGASUS_REQ_SET_REGS,
> PEGASUS_REQT_WRITE, 0, indx, data, size,
> 1000, GFP_NOIO);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + netif_dbg(pegasus, drv, pegasus->net, "%s failed with %d\n", __func__, ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -145,10 +153,15 @@ static int set_registers(pegasus_t *pegasus, __u16 indx, __u16 size,
> static int set_register(pegasus_t *pegasus, __u16 indx, __u8 data)
> {
> void *buf = &data;
> + int ret;
>
> - return usb_control_msg_send(pegasus->usb, 0, PEGASUS_REQ_SET_REG,
> + ret = usb_control_msg_send(pegasus->usb, 0, PEGASUS_REQ_SET_REG,
> PEGASUS_REQT_WRITE, data, indx, buf, 1,
> 1000, GFP_NOIO);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + netif_dbg(pegasus, drv, pegasus->net, "%s failed with %d\n", __func__, ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int update_eth_regs_async(pegasus_t *pegasus)
> @@ -188,10 +201,9 @@ static int update_eth_regs_async(pegasus_t *pegasus)
>
> static int __mii_op(pegasus_t *p, __u8 phy, __u8 indx, __u16 *regd, __u8 cmd)
> {
> - int i;
> - __u8 data[4] = { phy, 0, 0, indx };
> + int i, ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> __le16 regdi;
> - int ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + __u8 data[4] = { phy, 0, 0, indx };
>
> if (cmd & PHY_WRITE) {
> __le16 *t = (__le16 *) & data[1];
> @@ -211,8 +223,9 @@ static int __mii_op(pegasus_t *p, __u8 phy, __u8 indx, __u16 *regd, __u8 cmd)
> goto fail;
> if (cmd & PHY_READ) {
> ret = get_registers(p, PhyData, 2, ®di);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto fail;
> *regd = le16_to_cpu(regdi);
> - return ret;
> }
> return 0;
> fail:
> @@ -235,9 +248,13 @@ static int write_mii_word(pegasus_t *pegasus, __u8 phy, __u8 indx, __u16 *regd)
> static int mdio_read(struct net_device *dev, int phy_id, int loc)
> {
> pegasus_t *pegasus = netdev_priv(dev);
> + int ret;
> u16 res;
>
> - read_mii_word(pegasus, phy_id, loc, &res);
> + ret = read_mii_word(pegasus, phy_id, loc, &res);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> return (int)res;
> }
>
> @@ -251,10 +268,9 @@ static void mdio_write(struct net_device *dev, int phy_id, int loc, int val)
>
> static int read_eprom_word(pegasus_t *pegasus, __u8 index, __u16 *retdata)
> {
> - int i;
> - __u8 tmp = 0;
> + int ret, i;
> __le16 retdatai;
> - int ret;
> + __u8 tmp = 0;
>
> set_register(pegasus, EpromCtrl, 0);
> set_register(pegasus, EpromOffset, index);
> @@ -262,21 +278,25 @@ static int read_eprom_word(pegasus_t *pegasus, __u8 index, __u16 *retdata)
>
> for (i = 0; i < REG_TIMEOUT; i++) {
> ret = get_registers(pegasus, EpromCtrl, 1, &tmp);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto fail;
> if (tmp & EPROM_DONE)
> break;
> - if (ret == -ESHUTDOWN)
> - goto fail;
> }
> - if (i >= REG_TIMEOUT)
> + if (i >= REG_TIMEOUT) {
> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> goto fail;
> + }
>
> ret = get_registers(pegasus, EpromData, 2, &retdatai);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto fail;
> *retdata = le16_to_cpu(retdatai);
> return ret;
>
> fail:
> - netif_warn(pegasus, drv, pegasus->net, "%s failed\n", __func__);
> - return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + netif_dbg(pegasus, drv, pegasus->net, "%s failed\n", __func__);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> #ifdef PEGASUS_WRITE_EEPROM
> @@ -324,10 +344,10 @@ static int write_eprom_word(pegasus_t *pegasus, __u8 index, __u16 data)
> return ret;
>
> fail:
> - netif_warn(pegasus, drv, pegasus->net, "%s failed\n", __func__);
> + netif_dbg(pegasus, drv, pegasus->net, "%s failed\n", __func__);
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
> -#endif /* PEGASUS_WRITE_EEPROM */
> +#endif /* PEGASUS_WRITE_EEPROM */
>
> static inline int get_node_id(pegasus_t *pegasus, u8 *id)
> {
> @@ -367,19 +387,21 @@ static void set_ethernet_addr(pegasus_t *pegasus)
> return;
> err:
> eth_hw_addr_random(pegasus->net);
> - dev_info(&pegasus->intf->dev, "software assigned MAC address.\n");
> + netif_dbg(pegasus, drv, pegasus->net, "software assigned MAC address.\n");
>
> return;
> }
Not related to the patch, but, maybe, we should remove this return?
>
> static inline int reset_mac(pegasus_t *pegasus)
> {
> + int ret, i;
> __u8 data = 0x8;
> - int i;
>
> set_register(pegasus, EthCtrl1, data);
> for (i = 0; i < REG_TIMEOUT; i++) {
> - get_registers(pegasus, EthCtrl1, 1, &data);
> + ret = get_registers(pegasus, EthCtrl1, 1, &data);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto fail;
> if (~data & 0x08) {
> if (loopback)
> break;
> @@ -402,22 +424,29 @@ static inline int reset_mac(pegasus_t *pegasus)
> }
> if (usb_dev_id[pegasus->dev_index].vendor == VENDOR_ELCON) {
> __u16 auxmode;
> - read_mii_word(pegasus, 3, 0x1b, &auxmode);
> + ret = read_mii_word(pegasus, 3, 0x1b, &auxmode);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto fail;
> auxmode |= 4;
> write_mii_word(pegasus, 3, 0x1b, &auxmode);
> }
>
> return 0;
> +fail:
> + netif_dbg(pegasus, drv, pegasus->net, "%s failed\n", __func__);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int enable_net_traffic(struct net_device *dev, struct usb_device *usb)
> {
> - __u16 linkpart;
> - __u8 data[4];
> pegasus_t *pegasus = netdev_priv(dev);
> int ret;
> + __u16 linkpart;
> + __u8 data[4];
>
> - read_mii_word(pegasus, pegasus->phy, MII_LPA, &linkpart);
> + ret = read_mii_word(pegasus, pegasus->phy, MII_LPA, &linkpart);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto fail;
> data[0] = 0xc8; /* TX & RX enable, append status, no CRC */
> data[1] = 0;
> if (linkpart & (ADVERTISE_100FULL | ADVERTISE_10FULL))
> @@ -435,11 +464,16 @@ static int enable_net_traffic(struct net_device *dev, struct usb_device *usb)
> usb_dev_id[pegasus->dev_index].vendor == VENDOR_LINKSYS2 ||
> usb_dev_id[pegasus->dev_index].vendor == VENDOR_DLINK) {
> u16 auxmode;
> - read_mii_word(pegasus, 0, 0x1b, &auxmode);
> + ret = read_mii_word(pegasus, 0, 0x1b, &auxmode);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto fail;
> auxmode |= 4;
> write_mii_word(pegasus, 0, 0x1b, &auxmode);
> }
>
> + return 0;
> +fail:
> + netif_dbg(pegasus, drv, pegasus->net, "%s failed\n", __func__);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -447,9 +481,9 @@ static void read_bulk_callback(struct urb *urb)
> {
> pegasus_t *pegasus = urb->context;
> struct net_device *net;
> + u8 *buf = urb->transfer_buffer;
> int rx_status, count = urb->actual_length;
> int status = urb->status;
> - u8 *buf = urb->transfer_buffer;
> __u16 pkt_len;
>
> if (!pegasus)
> @@ -1049,6 +1083,7 @@ static __u8 mii_phy_probe(pegasus_t *pegasus)
>
> static inline void setup_pegasus_II(pegasus_t *pegasus)
> {
> + int ret;
> __u8 data = 0xa5;
>
> set_register(pegasus, Reg1d, 0);
> @@ -1060,7 +1095,9 @@ static inline void setup_pegasus_II(pegasus_t *pegasus)
> set_register(pegasus, Reg7b, 2);
>
> set_register(pegasus, 0x83, data);
> - get_registers(pegasus, 0x83, 1, &data);
> + ret = get_registers(pegasus, 0x83, 1, &data);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto fail;
>
> if (data == 0xa5)
> pegasus->chip = 0x8513;
> @@ -1075,6 +1112,8 @@ static inline void setup_pegasus_II(pegasus_t *pegasus)
> set_register(pegasus, Reg81, 6);
> else
> set_register(pegasus, Reg81, 2);
> +fail:
> + netif_dbg(pegasus, drv, pegasus->net, "%s failed\n", __func__);
> }
>
> static void check_carrier(struct work_struct *work)
>
Looks good to me.
Build test didn't generate any warnings (tested on top of v5.14-rc4 with
yours and mine patches applied). Smatch didn't generate any warnings as
well.
I found two more places, where read_mii_word() is used without error
checking: pegasus_ioctl() and mii_phy_probe(). If I understand
correctly, mii_phy_probe() is more dangerous one, since it's used in
->probe().
With regards,
Pavel Skripkin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists