[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210802070850.35295-1-likexu@tencent.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:08:50 +0800
From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] perf/x86/amd: Don't touch the AMD64_EVENTSEL_HOSTONLY bit inside the guest
From: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
If we use "perf record" in an AMD Milan guest, dmesg reports a #GP
warning from an unchecked MSR access error on MSR_F15H_PERF_CTLx:
[] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0xc0010200 (tried to write
0x0000020000110076) at rIP: 0xffffffff8106ddb4 (native_write_msr+0x4/0x20)
[] Call Trace:
[] amd_pmu_disable_event+0x22/0x90
[] x86_pmu_stop+0x4c/0xa0
[] x86_pmu_del+0x3a/0x140
The AMD64_EVENTSEL_HOSTONLY bit is defined and used on the host,
while the guest perf driver should avoid such use.
Fixes: 1018faa6cf23 ("perf/x86/kvm: Fix Host-Only/Guest-Only counting with SVM disabled")
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
Tested-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
---
v2: Add Fixes tag and Tested-by from Kim.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210720112605.63286-1-likexu@tencent.com/
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index d6003e08b055..1c3ae954a230 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -1116,8 +1116,9 @@ void x86_pmu_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags);
static inline void x86_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
+ u64 disable_mask = __this_cpu_read(cpu_hw_events.perf_ctr_virt_mask);
- wrmsrl(hwc->config_base, hwc->config);
+ wrmsrl(hwc->config_base, hwc->config & ~disable_mask);
if (is_counter_pair(hwc))
wrmsrl(x86_pmu_config_addr(hwc->idx + 1), 0);
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists