linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] scsi: BusLogic: use %X for u32 sized integer rather than %lX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <09bbe958ea12459f98f4fd62ac9a8823@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Aug 2021 08:11:42 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Colin King' <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Khalid Aziz <khalid@...ehiking.org>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] scsi: BusLogic: use %X for u32 sized integer rather than
 %lX

From: Colin King
> Sent: 30 July 2021 10:51
> 
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> An earlier fix changed the print format specifier for adapter->bios_addr
> to use %lX however the integer is a u32 so the fix was wrong. Fix this
> by using the correct %X format specifier.

Is that right?
I bet one 32bit arch defines u32 as long.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)