[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210802082621.xfbrdg2c6glwz3oq@box.shutemov.name>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 11:26:21 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memblock: make memblock_find_in_range method private
On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 09:37:37AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> There are a lot of uses of memblock_find_in_range() along with
> memblock_reserve() from the times memblock allocation APIs did not exist.
>
> memblock_find_in_range() is the very core of memblock allocations, so any
> future changes to its internal behaviour would mandate updates of all the
> users outside memblock.
>
> Replace the calls to memblock_find_in_range() with an equivalent calls to
> memblock_phys_alloc() and memblock_phys_alloc_range() and make
> memblock_find_in_range() private method of memblock.
>
> This simplifies the callers, ensures that (unlikely) errors in
> memblock_reserve() are handled and improves maintainability of
> memblock_find_in_range().
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Looks good to me:
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shtuemov@...ux.intel.com>
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists