[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <129ae4700e9740ad8ef1e5bb1862e2ff@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 08:52:44 +0000
From: zhengyongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
To: Hoang Huu Le <hoang.h.le@...tech.com.au>,
"jmaloy@...hat.com" <jmaloy@...hat.com>,
"ying.xue@...driver.com" <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: 答复: [PATCH net-next] tipc: Return the correct errno code
Hi hoang,
I don't notice that patch has been merged, If you need me to send a revert patch, I will send it as soon as possible.
If you submit the revert patch by your team, it's also ok.
Thanks,
Zheng
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Hoang Huu Le [mailto:hoang.h.le@...tech.com.au]
发送时间: 2021年8月2日 16:02
收件人: zhengyongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>; jmaloy@...hat.com; ying.xue@...driver.com; davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
主题: RE: [PATCH net-next] tipc: Return the correct errno code
Hi Zheng,
The patch was being merged by accident. Will have you planning to revert it?
We need to do ASAP since calling path tipc_node_xmit() -> tipc_link_xmit() broken as side effect.
Thanks,
hoang
> -----Original Message-----
> From: zhengyongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 8:35 AM
> To: jmaloy@...hat.com; ying.xue@...driver.com; davem@...emloft.net;
> kuba@...nel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; tipc-
> discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: 答复: [PATCH net-next] tipc: Return the correct errno code
>
> Sorry, this patch is wrong, please ignore it, thanks :)
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: zhengyongjun
> 发送时间: 2021年6月4日 9:47
> 收件人: jmaloy@...hat.com; ying.xue@...driver.com; davem@...emloft.net;
> kuba@...nel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; tipc-
> discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> 抄送: zhengyongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
> 主题: [PATCH net-next] tipc: Return the correct errno code
>
> When kalloc or kmemdup failed, should return ENOMEM rather than ENOBUF.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
> ---
> net/tipc/link.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c index
> c44b4bfaaee6..5b6181277cc5 100644
> --- a/net/tipc/link.c
> +++ b/net/tipc/link.c
> @@ -912,7 +912,7 @@ static int link_schedule_user(struct tipc_link *l, struct tipc_msg *hdr)
> skb = tipc_msg_create(SOCK_WAKEUP, 0, INT_H_SIZE, 0,
> dnode, l->addr, dport, 0, 0);
> if (!skb)
> - return -ENOBUFS;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> msg_set_dest_droppable(buf_msg(skb), true);
> TIPC_SKB_CB(skb)->chain_imp = msg_importance(hdr);
> skb_queue_tail(&l->wakeupq, skb);
> @@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ void tipc_link_reset(struct tipc_link *l)
> *
> * Consumes the buffer chain.
> * Messages at TIPC_SYSTEM_IMPORTANCE are always accepted
> - * Return: 0 if success, or errno: -ELINKCONG, -EMSGSIZE or -ENOBUFS
> + * Return: 0 if success, or errno: -ELINKCONG, -EMSGSIZE or -ENOBUFS
> + or -ENOMEM
> */
> int tipc_link_xmit(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff_head *list,
> struct sk_buff_head *xmitq)
> @@ -1088,7 +1088,7 @@ int tipc_link_xmit(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff_head *list,
> if (!_skb) {
> kfree_skb(skb);
> __skb_queue_purge(list);
> - return -ENOBUFS;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> }
> __skb_queue_tail(transmq, skb);
> tipc_link_set_skb_retransmit_time(skb, l);
> --
> 2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists