[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJXy1L-OC7k+h6pOwFGNS8WntNSMjP1Kvu7tnCQvGNwnRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 14:10:36 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To: Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, luka.perkov@...tura.hr
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: tn48m: Add support for Delta TN4810M CPLD
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 12:17 AM Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr> wrote:
>
> Delta TN4810M uses a similar CPLD GPIO expander
> like the TN48M, but it has pins for 48 SFP+ ports,
> making a total of 192 pins.
> It also provides the TX fault pins which the TN48M
> does not.
>
> Only TX disable pins like on the TN48M are output
> ones.
>
> Thankfully, regmap GPIO allows for the driver to be
> easily extended to support the TN4810M.
>
> Note that this patch depends on the following series:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-gpio/list/?series=247538
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tn48m.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tn48m.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tn48m.c
> index b12a6b4bc4b3..e429e7ade941 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tn48m.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tn48m.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,10 @@ enum tn48m_gpio_type {
> TN48M_SFP_TX_DISABLE = 1,
> TN48M_SFP_PRESENT,
> TN48M_SFP_LOS,
> + TN4810M_SFP_TX_DISABLE,
> + TN4810M_SFP_TX_FAULT,
> + TN4810M_SFP_PRESENT,
> + TN4810M_SFP_LOS,
> };
>
> static int tn48m_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -46,17 +50,36 @@ static int tn48m_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> config.regmap = regmap;
> config.parent = &pdev->dev;
> - config.ngpio = 4;
> + config.ngpio_per_reg = 8;
>
> switch (type) {
> case TN48M_SFP_TX_DISABLE:
> config.reg_set_base = base;
> + config.ngpio = 4;
> break;
> case TN48M_SFP_PRESENT:
> config.reg_dat_base = base;
> + config.ngpio = 4;
> break;
> case TN48M_SFP_LOS:
> config.reg_dat_base = base;
> + config.ngpio = 4;
> + break;
> + case TN4810M_SFP_TX_DISABLE:
> + config.reg_set_base = base;
> + config.ngpio = 48;
> + break;
> + case TN4810M_SFP_TX_FAULT:
> + config.reg_dat_base = base;
> + config.ngpio = 48;
> + break;
> + case TN4810M_SFP_PRESENT:
> + config.reg_dat_base = base;
> + config.ngpio = 48;
> + break;
> + case TN4810M_SFP_LOS:
> + config.reg_dat_base = base;
> + config.ngpio = 48;
> break;
> default:
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unknown type %d\n", type);
> @@ -67,9 +90,34 @@ static int tn48m_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id tn48m_gpio_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "delta,tn48m-gpio-sfp-tx-disable", .data = (void *)TN48M_SFP_TX_DISABLE },
> - { .compatible = "delta,tn48m-gpio-sfp-present", .data = (void *)TN48M_SFP_PRESENT },
> - { .compatible = "delta,tn48m-gpio-sfp-los", .data = (void *)TN48M_SFP_LOS },
> + {
> + .compatible = "delta,tn48m-gpio-sfp-tx-disable",
> + .data = (void *)TN48M_SFP_TX_DISABLE
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "delta,tn48m-gpio-sfp-present",
> + .data = (void *)TN48M_SFP_PRESENT
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "delta,tn48m-gpio-sfp-los",
> + .data = (void *)TN48M_SFP_LOS
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "delta,tn4810m-gpio-sfp-tx-disable",
> + .data = (void *)TN4810M_SFP_TX_DISABLE
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "delta,tn4810m-gpio-sfp-tx-fault",
> + .data = (void *)TN4810M_SFP_TX_FAULT
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "delta,tn4810m-gpio-sfp-present",
> + .data = (void *)TN4810M_SFP_PRESENT
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "delta,tn4810m-gpio-sfp-los",
> + .data = (void *)TN4810M_SFP_LOS
> + },
> { }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tn48m_gpio_of_match);
> --
> 2.31.1
>
This looks good to me. I suppose the other patches are going in
through the MFD tree. I don't see anything that can fail here at
build-time - can you confirm that I can pick these patches up
separately for v5.15?
Bartosz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists